Sarah-Mai Dang

Monat: Januar 2016

Peer review „is ineffective…“

„largely a lottery, anti-innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant“, erklärt Richard Smith, ehemaliger Redakteur des British Medical Journal in Stephen Currys Artikel „Peer review, preprints and the speed of science“ im Guardian.

© 2020 oa books

Theme von Anders NorénHoch ↑